In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Civil Cases - Report No. 17-02 , 228 So. 3d 531 ( 2017 )

Supreme Court of Florida
____________
No. SC17-514
____________
IN RE: STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CIVIL CASES—REPORT
NO. 17-02.
[November 2, 2017]
PER CURIAM.
The Supreme Court Committee on Standard Jury Instructions in Civil Cases
(Committee) has submitted proposed changes to the standard jury instructions and
asks that the Court authorize the amended standard instructions for publication and
use. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 2(a), Fla. Const.
The Committee filed its report proposing to amend civil jury instructions
502.2 (Wrongful Death Damages: Elements for Estate and Survivors), and 601.2
(Believability of Witnesses). The Committee published its proposals in The
Florida Bar News. No comments were received pertaining to the proposal to
amend instruction 502.2, while three comments were received pertaining to the
proposal to amend instruction 601.2. Upon consideration of these comments, the
Committee did not revise its proposed amendments, and the Court did not publish
the Committee’s proposals.
Because subparagraphs (d) (Damages of surviving spouse), (e) (Damages by
surviving child), and (f) (Damages by surviving parent of child) of instruction
502.2 do not precisely explain that survivors’ pain and suffering damages are to be
measured from the date of the decedent’s injury, instruction 502.2 is amended to
add the language “[from the date of the injury]” to the above-identified
subparagraphs to clarify when survivors’ pain and suffering damages should be
measured.
The proposal to amend instruction 601.2 derives from criminal instruction
3.9 (Weighing the Evidence), which explains that it is proper for a lawyer to talk to
a witness about what testimony the witness would give if called to testify. Civil
instruction 601.2 is amended to provide that “[It is entirely proper for a lawyer to
talk to a witness about what testimony the witness would give if called to the
courtroom. The witness should not be discredited just because the witness talked
with a lawyer about [his] [her] testimony.]” In addition, the Committee added a
new Note on Use for 601.2, which states that “Witness talked to lawyer. This may
be given if requested as either a substantive or a curative instruction whenever
there is testimony that a witness spoke to or met with an attorney for one of the
-2-
parties. This instruction is not meant to prohibit or limit argument by counsel of
the general considerations set forth in 601.2a.”
Having considered the Committee’s report, the comments submitted in
response, and the Committee’s reply thereto, we authorize the Committee’s
proposals for publication and use as set forth in the appendix to this opinion. New
language is indicated by underlining. In authorizing the publication and use of
these instructions, we express no opinion on their correctness and remind all
interested parties that this authorization forecloses neither requesting additional or
alternative instructions nor contesting the legal correctness of the instructions. We
further caution all interested parties that any comments associated with the
instructions reflect only the opinion of the Committee and are not necessarily
indicative of the views of this Court as to their correctness or applicability. The
instructions as set forth in the appendix shall become effective when this opinion
becomes final.
It is so ordered.
LABARGA, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, POLSTON,
and LAWSON, JJ., concur.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND,
IF FILED, DETERMINED.
Original Proceeding – Supreme Court Committee on Standard Jury Instructions in
Civil Cases
Rebecca Mercier Vargas, Chair, Supreme Court Committee on Standard Jury
-3-
Instructions in Civil Cases, West Palm Beach, Florida; and Laura K. Whitmore,
Vice Chair and Subcommittee Chair, Filing Subcommittee of the Supreme Court
Committee on Standard Jury Instructions in Civil Cases, Tampa, Florida,
for Petitioner
-4-
APPENDIX
502.2 WRONGFUL DEATH DAMAGES: ELEMENTS
FOR ESTATE AND SURVIVORS
ELEMENTS FOR ESTATE:
In determining the damages recoverable on behalf of (decedent’s) estate,
you shall consider the following elements:
a. Lost earnings:
The estate’s loss of earnings of (decedent) from the date of injury to the
date of death, [less any amount of monetary support you determine a survivor
lost during that period].
b. Lost accumulations:
The estate’s loss of net accumulations: “Net accumulations” is the part
of (decedent’s) net income [from salary or business] after taxes, including
pension benefits [but excluding income from investments continuing beyond
death], which (decedent), after paying [his] [her] personal expenses and
monies for the support of [his] [her] survivors, would have left as part of [his]
[her] estate if [he] [she] had lived [his] [her] normal life expectancy.
NOTE ON USE FOR 502.2b
The estate may recover lost accumulations when the sole survivor is a parent
without a cause of action in his or her own right, as well as when survivors include
a spouse or lineal descendant. F.S. 768.21(6)(a) (1985); Vildibill v. Johnson, 492
So. 2d 1047 (Fla. 1986). The committee expresses no opinion concerning whether
“net accumulations” include income ending at death which is not derived from
salary or business. See F.S. 768.18(5) (1985); Delta Airlines, Inc. v. Ageloff, 552
So. 2d 1089 (Fla. 1989); Wilcox v. Leverock, 548 So. 2d 1116 (Fla. 1989).
c. Medical or funeral expenses:
Medical or funeral expenses due to (decedent’s) injury or death which
[have become a charge against (decedent’s) estate] [were paid by or on behalf
of (decedent) by one other than a survivor].
-5-
ELEMENTS FOR SURVIVING SPOUSE,
CHILD, OR PARENTS OF CHILD:
In determining any damages to be awarded (decedent’s) personal
representative for the benefit of (decedent’s) surviving [spouse] [children] [or]
[parents], you shall consider certain additional elements of damage for which
there is no exact standard for fixing the compensation to be awarded. Any
such award should be fair and just in the light of the evidence regarding the
following elements:
d. Damages of surviving spouse:
The [(wife’s) (husband’s)] loss of (decedent’s) companionship and
protection, and [her] [his] mental pain and suffering as a result of (decedent’s)
injury and death [from the date of injury]. In determining the duration of the
losses, you may consider the [joint life expectancy of (decedent) and (surviving
spouse)] [life expectancy of (surviving spouse)] together with the other evidence
in the case.
NOTES ON USE FOR 502.2d
1. F.S. 768.18 and 768.21 (1990), applicable to causes of action accruing
after October 1, 1990, expand eligible survivor claimants in wrongful death actions
by surviving parents and children, but are not applicable to claims for medical
malpractice as defined by F.S. 766.106(1) (1989).
2. This instruction is intended to allow a jury determination, if warranted
by the evidence, that the surviving spouse’s loss will continue beyond the “joint
life expectancy” until the survivor’s death, or will end before that actuarial period
has elapsed.
e. Damages by surviving child:
The loss by (name all eligible children) of parental companionship,
instruction and guidance, and [his] [her] [their] mental pain and suffering as a
result of (decedent’s) injury and death [from the date of injury]. In
determining the duration of those losses, you may consider the [joint life
expectancy of (decedent) and (surviving child) [each of (surviving children)]]
[life expectancy of (surviving children) [each of the surviving children]]
together with the other evidence in the case.
-6-
f. Damages by surviving parent of child:
The mental pain and suffering of (parents) as a result of the injury and
death of (child) [from the date of injury]. In determining the duration of
mental pain and suffering, you may consider the life [expectancy]
[expectancies] of (surviving parent(s)) together with the other evidence in the
case.
ELEMENTS FOR SURVIVORS, INCLUDING SURVIVING SPOUSE, CHILD, OR
PARENTS OF CHILD:
In determining any damages to be awarded (decedent’s) personal
representative for the benefit of [each of] (decedent’s) survivor[s]* (name them
all), you shall consider the following elements:
*Further instructions may be required if there is a factual question of
whether a person is a “survivor” within the meaning of F.S. 768.18(1).
g. Lost support and services:
The [survivor’s] [survivors’, (name them all)], loss, by reason of
(decedent’s) injury and death, of (decedent’s) support and services [including
interest at (legal rate) on any amount awarded for such loss from the date of
injury to the date of death]. In determining the duration of any future loss,
you may consider the joint life expectancy of the survivor(s) and (decedent)
[and the period of minority, ending at age 25, of a healthy minor child].
In evaluating past and future loss of support and services, you shall
consider the survivor’s relationship to (decedent), the amount of (decedent’s)
probable net income available for distribution to the survivor and the
replacement value of (decedent’s) services to the survivor(s). [“Support”
includes contributions in kind as well as sums of money. “Services” means
tasks regularly performed by (decedent) for a survivor that will be a necessary
expense to the survivor because of (decedent’s) death.]*
*The bracketed material should be given only when warranted by the
evidence and requested by a party.
NOTES ON USE FOR 502.2g
-7-
1. Period of minority. The period of minority for purposes of the
wrongful death act is age 25. F.S. 768.18(2). The bracketed reference to the period
of minority, in the first paragraph, should not be given if the minor survivor’s
dependency will continue beyond that age because the child is not “healthy,” or if
the decedent was a minor on whose support or services the claimant survivor
would remain dependent beyond that time.
2. Support and services specially defined. The special definitions of
these terms bracketed in the second paragraph should be given only when
warranted by the evidence and requested by a party.
h. Medical and funeral expenses paid by survivor:
[Medical] [or] [funeral] expenses due to (decedent’s) [injury] [or] [death]
paid by any survivor.
601.2 BELIEVABILITY OF WITNESSES
a. General considerations:
Let me speak briefly about witnesses. In evaluating the believability of
any witness and the weight you will give the testimony of any witness, you may
properly consider the demeanor of the witness while testifying; the frankness
or lack of frankness of the witness; the intelligence of the witness; any interest
the witness may have in the outcome of the case; the means and opportunity
the witness had to know the facts about which the witness testified; the ability
of the witness to remember the matters about which the witness testified; and
the reasonableness of the testimony of the witness, considered in the light of
all the evidence in the case and in the light of your own experience and
common sense.
b. Expert witnesses:
[You have heard opinion testimony [on certain technical subjects] from
[a person] [persons] referred to as [an] expert witness[es].] [Some of the
testimony before you was in the form of opinions about certain technical
subjects.]
-8-
You may accept such opinion testimony, reject it, or give it the weight
you think it deserves, considering the knowledge, skill, experience, training, or
education of the witness, the reasons given by the witness for the opinion
expressed, and all the other evidence in the case.
c. Witness talked to lawyer:
[It is entirely proper for a lawyer to talk to a witness about what
testimony the witness would give if called to the courtroom. The witness
should not be discredited just because the witness talked with a lawyer about
[his] [her] testimony.]
NOTES ON USE FOR 601.2
1. Expert witness. See F.S. 90.702 (1985), and Shaw v. Puleo, 159 So. 2d
641 (Fla. 1964). The court will select one or the other introductory sentence in
keeping with the court’s practice and preference in announcing before the jury, or
acceding to counsel’s characterization, that a tendered witness is an “expert.”
2. Common knowledge and everyday experience. Except to the extent
indicated in instruction 601.2, the committee recommends that the jury not be
instructed that the jurors may bring to bear their “common knowledge and
everyday experience.”
3. Failure to produce witness. The committee recommends that no
instruction be given. While it may be permissible in some circumstances to instruct
the jury regarding inferences arising from a party’s failure to produce a witness
(compare Weeks v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co., 132 So. 2d 315 (Fla. 1st
DCA 1961), with Georgia Southern & Florida Railway Co. v. Perry, 326 F.2d
921 (5th Cir. 1964)), the committee believes that generally such inferences are
more properly referred to in counsel’s argument.
4. Witness talked to lawyer. This may be given if requested as either a
substantive or a curative instruction whenever there is testimony that a witness
spoke to or met with an attorney for one of the parties. This instruction is not
meant to prohibit or limit argument by counsel of the general considerations set
forth in 601.2a.
-9-