George James Trepal v. State of Florida , 235 So. 3d 281 ( 2018 )

Supreme Court of Florida
____________
No. SC17-892
____________
GEORGE JAMES TREPAL,
Appellant,
vs.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
[January 26, 2018]
PER CURIAM.
We have for review George James Trepal’s appeal of the circuit court’s
order denying Trepal’s motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal
Procedure 3.851. This Court has jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const.
Trepal’s motion sought relief pursuant to the United States Supreme Court’s
decision in Hurst v. Florida, 136 S. Ct. 616 (2016), and our decision on remand in
Hurst v. State (Hurst), 202 So. 3d 40 (Fla. 2016), cert. denied, 137 S. Ct. 2161
(2017). This Court stayed Trepal’s appeal pending the disposition of Hitchcock v.
State, 226 So. 3d 216 (Fla. 2017), cert. denied, 138 S. Ct. 513 (2017). After this
Court decided Hitchcock, Trepal responded to this Court’s order to show cause
arguing why Hitchcock should not be dispositive in this case.
After reviewing Trepal’s response to the order to show cause, as well as the
State’s arguments in reply, we conclude that Trepal is not entitled to relief. Trepal
was sentenced to death following a jury’s recommendation for death by a vote of
nine to three. Trepal v. State, 621 So. 2d 1361, 1363 (Fla. 1993). Trepal’s
sentence of death became final in 1994. Trepal v. Florida, 510 U.S. 1077 (1994).
Thus, Hurst does not apply retroactively to Trepal’s sentence of death. See
Hitchcock, 226 So. 3d at 217. Accordingly, we affirm the denial of Trepal’s
motion.
The Court having carefully considered all arguments raised by Trepal, we
caution that any rehearing motion containing reargument will be stricken. It is so
ordered.
LABARGA, C.J., and POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.
PARIENTE, J., concurs in result with an opinion.
LEWIS and CANADY, JJ., concur in result.
QUINCE, J., recused.
PARIENTE, J., concurring in result.
I concur in result because I recognize that this Court’s opinion in Hitchcock
v. State, 226 So. 3d 216 (Fla. 2017), cert. denied, 138 S. Ct. 513 (2017), is now
final. However, I continue to adhere to the views expressed in my dissenting
opinion in Hitchcock.
-2-
An Appeal from the Circuit Court in and for Polk County,
Jalal A. Harb, Judge - Case No. 531990CF001569A1XXXX
Neal Dupree, Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, Todd G. Scher, and Brittney
Nicole Lacy, Assistant Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, Southern Region, Fort
Lauderdale, Florida,
for Appellant
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Christina Z. Pacheco, Assistant Attorney
General, Tampa, Florida,
for Appellee
-3-