Toney Deron Davis v. Julie L. Jones, etc. , 235 So. 3d 298 ( 2018 )


Menu:
  •           Supreme Court of Florida
    ____________
    No. SC17-1711
    ____________
    TONEY DERON DAVIS,
    Petitioner,
    vs.
    JULIE L. JONES, etc.,
    Respondent.
    [January 30, 2018]
    PER CURIAM.
    Toney Deron Davis petitions this Court for a writ of habeas corpus seeking
    relief pursuant to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Hurst v. Florida,
    
    136 S. Ct. 616
     (2016), and our decision on remand in Hurst v. State (Hurst), 
    202 So. 3d 40
     (Fla. 2016), cert. denied, 
    137 S. Ct. 2161
     (2017). This Court has
    jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(9), Fla. Const.
    After this Court decided Hitchcock v. State, 
    226 So. 3d 216
     (Fla. 2017), cert.
    denied, 
    138 S. Ct. 513
     (2017), we ordered Davis to show cause why Hitchcock
    should not be dispositive in this case.
    After reviewing Davis’s response to the order to show cause, as well as the
    State’s arguments in reply, we conclude that Davis is not entitled to relief. Davis
    was sentenced to death following a jury’s recommendation for death by a vote of
    eleven to one. Davis v. State, 
    703 So. 2d 1055
    , 1057 (Fla. 1997). Davis’s sentence
    of death became final in 1998. Davis v. Florida, 
    524 U.S. 930
     (1998). Thus, Hurst
    does not apply retroactively to Davis’s sentence. See Hitchcock, 226 So. 3d at
    217. Accordingly, we deny Davis’s petition.
    The Court having carefully considered all arguments raised by Davis, we
    caution that any rehearing motion containing reargument will be stricken. It is so
    ordered.
    LABARGA, C.J., and QUINCE, POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.
    PARIENTE, J., concurs in result with an opinion.
    LEWIS and CANADY, JJ., concur in result.
    PARIENTE, J., concurring in result.
    I concur in result because I recognize that this Court’s opinion in Hitchcock
    v. State, 
    226 So. 3d 216
     (Fla. 2017), cert. denied, 
    138 S. Ct. 513
     (2017), is now
    final. However, I continue to adhere to the views expressed in my dissenting
    opinion in Hitchcock.
    Original Proceeding – Habeas Corpus, Duval County,
    Case No. 161992CF013193AXXXMA
    Rick A. Sichta, Susanne K. Sichta, and Joe Hamrick of The Sichta Firm, LLC,
    Jacksonville, Florida,
    -2-
    for Petitioner
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jennifer L. Keegan, Assistant Attorney
    General, Tallahassee, Florida,
    for Respondent
    -3-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: SC17-1711

Citation Numbers: 235 So. 3d 298

Filed Date: 1/30/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 1/12/2023