Chadwick Willacy v. State of Florida , 238 So. 3d 100 ( 2018 )


Menu:
  •           Supreme Court of Florida
    ____________
    No. SC17-1605
    ____________
    CHADWICK WILLACY,
    Appellant,
    vs.
    STATE OF FLORIDA,
    Appellee.
    [January 23, 2018]
    PER CURIAM.
    We have for review Chadwick Willacy’s appeal of the circuit court’s order
    denying Willacy’s motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure
    3.851. This Court has jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const.
    Willacy’s motion sought relief pursuant to the United States Supreme
    Court’s decision in Hurst v. Florida, 
    136 S. Ct. 616
     (2016), and our decision on
    remand in Hurst v. State (Hurst), 
    202 So. 3d 40
     (Fla. 2016), cert. denied, 
    137 S. Ct. 2161
     (2017). This Court stayed Willacy’s appeal pending the disposition of
    Hitchcock v. State, 
    226 So. 3d 216
     (Fla. 2017), cert. denied, 
    138 S. Ct. 513
     (2017).
    After this Court decided Hitchcock, Willacy responded to this Court’s order to
    show cause arguing why Hitchcock should not be dispositive in this case.
    After reviewing Willacy’s response to the order to show cause, as well as the
    State’s arguments in reply, we conclude that Willacy is not entitled to relief.
    Willacy was sentenced to death following a jury’s recommendation for death by a
    vote of eleven to one. Willacy v. State, 
    696 So. 2d 693
    , 694 (Fla. 1997).
    Willacy’s sentence of death became final in 1997. Willacy v. Florida, 
    522 U.S. 970
     (1997). Thus, Hurst does not apply retroactively to Willacy’s sentence of
    death. See Hitchcock, 226 So. 3d at 217. Accordingly, we affirm the denial of
    Willacy’s motion.
    The Court having carefully considered all arguments raised by Willacy, we
    caution that any rehearing motion containing reargument will be stricken. It is so
    ordered.
    LABARGA, C.J., and QUINCE, POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.
    PARIENTE, J., concurs in result with an opinion.
    LEWIS and CANADY, JJ., concur in result.
    PARIENTE, J., concurring in result.
    I concur in result because I recognize that this Court’s opinion in Hitchcock
    v. State, 
    226 So. 3d 216
     (Fla. 2017), cert. denied, 
    138 S. Ct. 513
     (2017), is now
    final. However, I continue to adhere to the views expressed in my dissenting
    opinion in Hitchcock.
    -2-
    An Appeal from the Circuit Court in and for Brevard County,
    William David Dugan, Judge - Case No. 051990CF016062AXXXXX
    Linda McDermott of McClain and McDermott, Wilton Manners, Florida,
    for Appellant
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Lisa Maria Lerner, Assistant Attorney
    General, West Palm Beach, Florida,
    for Appellee
    -3-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: SC17-1605

Citation Numbers: 238 So. 3d 100

Filed Date: 1/23/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 1/12/2023