Frederick v. State , 155 So. 3d 1253 ( 2015 )

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Defendant’s claim that his consecutive minimum mandatory sentences are illegal because they arose from the same criminal episode is rejected for the reasons stated in Williams v. State, 125 So.3d 879 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (en banc).

CIKLIN, LEVINE and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.