Ruth-Hinote v. Calico Jacks USA, Inc. , 43 So. 3d 764 ( 2010 )

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Rayner v. Aircraft Spruce-Advantage Inc., 38 So.3d 817, 820 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010) (“[LJack of prejudice, in this context, requires a showing that the new party had knowledge of the lawsuit prior to expiration of the statute of limitations.”).

BENTON, VAN NORTWICK, and WETHERELL, JJ., concur.