Mullins v. State , 66 So. 3d 1091 ( 2011 )

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Hill v. State, 549 So.2d 179, 182 (Fla.1989) (failure to present constitutional argument grounded on due process to trial court procedurally bars appellant from presenting argument on appeal); State v. Fernandez, 546 So.2d 791 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989) (approving a “cash for weight” agreement in which the amount of the confidential informant’s fee was based upon the amount of drugs involved.)