United States v. Frazier ( 1998 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6670
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
PAUL E. FRAZIER,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 98-6671
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
PAUL E. FRAZIER,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern Dis-
trict of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Irene M. Keeley, District
Judge. (CR-94-6, CA-97-65-3, CR-94-8, CA-97-66-3)
Submitted: July 30, 1998 Decided: August 26, 1998
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kevin David Mills, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellant.
William David Wilmoth, United States Attorney, Wheeling, West
Virginia; Thomas Oliver Mucklow, Assistant United States Attorney,
Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying
his motions filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp.
1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealabil-
ity and dismiss the appeals on the reasoning of the district court.
United States v. Frazier, Nos. CR-94-6; CR-94-8; CA-97-65-3; CA-97-
66-3 (N.D.W. Va. Mar. 30, 1998). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci-
sional process.
DISMISSED
2