Friedman v. State , 173 So. 3d 1054 ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •        Third District Court of Appeal
    State of Florida
    Opinion filed July 29, 2015.
    Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
    ________________
    No. 3D15-490
    Lower Tribunal Nos. 11-641 K & 11-642 K
    ________________
    Eli M. Friedman,
    Appellant,
    vs.
    The State of Florida,
    Appellee.
    An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the
    Circuit Court for Monroe County, Wayne M. Miller, Judge.
    Eli M. Friedman, in proper person.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Sandra Lipman, Assistant Attorney
    General, for appellee.
    Before LAGOA, EMAS, and FERNANDEZ, JJ.
    LAGOA, J.
    The Defendant, Eli M. Friedman (“Friedman”), appeals from the trial court’s
    February 3, 2015 order denying his Motion to Correct Award of Prior Prison
    Credit.
    Friedman argues that he is entitled to an additional 20 days of credit for time
    served,1 from September 13, 2012 through October 3, 2012. This time period,
    however, concerns the dates he spent in jail awaiting to be transported to prison
    after being sentenced on September 13, 2012. The State is correct that Friedman
    must first raise this issue with the Department of Corrections and “may only
    request judicial relief after exhausting administrative remedies.” Hidalgo v. State,
    
    729 So. 2d 984
    , 987 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999) (“The Department of Corrections is
    responsible for computing [an inmate's] credit for time spent in county jail after
    sentencing, while awaiting transfers to a drug program or a state prison. If the
    postsentence credit is incorrect, [the inmate] should pursue his administrative
    remedies, and then seek a writ of mandamus against the department in the circuit
    court, if dissatisfied with the outcome.” (quoting Washington v. State, 
    662 So. 2d 1027
    , 1028 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) (citation omitted))).
    Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s order. Our affirmance in this case is
    without prejudice to pursue such an administrative remedy.
    1 Previously, Friedman filed a motion to correct sentence. On August 4, 2014, the
    trial court granted the motion and ordered that Friedman be granted an additional
    225 days credit for time served to the 504 days credit already appearing on his
    judgment and sentence.
    2
    AFFIRMED.
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 15-0490

Citation Numbers: 173 So. 3d 1054

Filed Date: 7/29/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 1/12/2023