ARMANDO B. HIDALGO v. STATE OF FLORIDA ( 2019 )

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING
MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
OF FLORIDA
SECOND DISTRICT
ARMANDO B. HIDALGO, )
)
Appellant, )
)
v. ) Case No. 2D19-399
)
STATE OF FLORIDA, )
)
Appellee. )
___________________________________)
Opinion filed September 18, 2019.
Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P.
9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court
for DeSoto County; Don T. Hall,
Judge.
Armando B. Hidalgo, pro se.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See State v. Drawdy, 136 So. 3d 1209 (Fla. 2014); State v.
Meshell, 2 So. 3d 132 (Fla. 2009); Melvin v. State, 645 So. 2d 448 (Fla. 1994); Lindquist
v. State, 155 So. 3d 1193 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014); Hughes v. State, 22 So. 3d 132 (Fla. 2d
DCA 2009); Waiter v. State, 965 So. 2d 861 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007); Carlyle v. State, 945
So. 2d 540 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006); Coughlin v. State, 932 So. 2d 1224 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006)
(en banc); Shortridge v. State, 884 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); Vidak v. State, 793
So. 2d 27 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001); Haynes v. State, 106 So. 3d 481 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013);
Schwenn v. State, 898 So. 2d 1130 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005).
NORTHCUTT, VILLANTI, and LaROSE, JJ., Concur.