Matthew R. Hinson v. State of Florida ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •                                         IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
    FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
    MATTHEW R. HINSON,                      NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
    FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
    Appellant,                        DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
    v.                                      CASE NO. 1D16-2638
    STATE OF FLORIDA,
    Appellee.
    _____________________________/
    Opinion filed May 31, 2017.
    An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.
    Russell L. Healey, Judge.
    Matthew R. Hinson, pro se, Appellant.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Thomas H. Duffy, Assistant Attorney
    General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
    PER CURIAM.
    Appellant challenges the trial court’s order denying Appellant’s motion for
    post-conviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. One of
    Appellant’s claims is that he involuntarily entered his plea out of a well-founded fear
    that his counsel would be unprepared at trial. The trial court observed that it appeared
    from the record that counsel was prepared for trial, but the court did not conduct an
    evidentiary hearing on counsel’s state of preparation or attach portions of the record
    conclusively refuting this argument. Because this claim is colorable and not
    conclusively refuted by the attachments to the order, we reverse the denial of this
    claim and remand for further consideration of this claim only. E.g., Green v. State,
    
    827 So. 2d 1060
    , 1061 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Lanier v. State, 
    789 So. 2d 520
    , 521
    (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). We otherwise affirm the order.
    REVERSED in part and REMANDED.
    WETHERELL, MAKAR, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 16-2638

Filed Date: 5/30/2017

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 5/31/2017