United States v. Roderick Whitaker ( 2016 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7989
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
RODERICK ARNEZ WHITAKER, a/k/a Snoop,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior
District Judge. (5:09-cr-00125-BR-1)
Submitted: April 21, 2016 Decided: April 26, 2016
Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Roderick Arnez Whitaker, Appellant Pro Se. Banumathi
Rangarajan, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Roderick Arnez Whitaker appeals the district court’s order
granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for sentence
reduction based on Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we deny Whitaker’s motion for appointment of
counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
See United States v. Whitaker, No. 5:09-cr-00125-BR-1 (E.D.N.C.
Sept. 11, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid in the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2