Holder v. Sutherland , 191 So. 2d 439 ( 1966 )

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the court and the briefs and record on appeal having been studied, this court does not find it can substitute its judgment for that of the jury and finding no reversible error, the judgment appealed is affirmed under authority of Calhoun v. State, 136 So.2d 352 (Fla.App. 1st, 1962).

WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., and JOHNSON and SACK, JJ., concur.