Hopper v. State , 269 So. 2d 35 ( 1972 )


Menu:
  • PER CURIAM.

    We have reviewed the briefs and record on appeal and heard oral argument. On the basis thereof, we are of the opinion that no reversible error has been made to clearly appear. The judgment appealed from is, therefore, affirmed.

    Affirmed.

    WALDEN, OWEN, and MAGER, JJ., concur.

Document Info

Docket Number: Nos. 71-132, 71-151

Citation Numbers: 269 So. 2d 35

Judges: Mager, Owen, Walden

Filed Date: 11/17/1972

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 7/29/2022