Muina v. Hood , 349 So. 2d 745 ( 1977 )


Menu:
  • PER CURIAM.

    This interlocutory appeal presents several points, including the jurisdiction of the trial court which alone is a proper matter for interlocutory appeal. On that point appellant’s argument is without substantial merit. Fla.App. Rule 4.2.c. The interlocutory appeal is

    DISMISSED.

    RAWLS, Acting C. J., and SMITH and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Document Info

Docket Number: No. GG-294

Citation Numbers: 349 So. 2d 745

Judges: Ervin, Rawls, Smith

Filed Date: 8/25/1977

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 7/29/2022