Taplin v. Taplin , 361 So. 2d 827 ( 1978 )

PER CURIAM.

The appellant wife appeals an order denying her petition for modification and her petition for attorney’s fees. She urges error upon the argument that the manifest weight of the evidence established her need for, and the husband’s ability to respond to, an increase in alimony. We find that no error has been shown. See Herzog v. Herzog, 346 So.2d 56 (Fla.1977); and Shaw v. Shaw, 334 So.2d 13 (Fla.1976).

Affirmed.