Casey v. State , 378 So. 2d 878 ( 1979 )

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the revocation, but we remand the case for correction of the revocation order. Since at the hearing, the court heard no evidence on appellant’s leaving his residence without the probation officer’s approval, it should now remove any reference to this violation. Appellant need not be present for this purpose.

GRIMES, C. J., and HOBSON and BOARDMAN, JJ., concur.