Vazquez v. State , 453 So. 2d 215 ( 1984 )

PER CURIAM.

On remand,¹ we find that sufficient evidence was presented below to support Vazquez’ conviction for assault. As to all remaining points raised, we likewise find no error and AFFIRM.

COBB, C.J., and FRANK D. UP-CHURCH, Jr. and SHARP, JJ., concur.

1 . See Vazquez v. State, 427 So.2d 1125 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983), quashed State v. Vazquez, 450 So.2d 203 (Fla.1984).