Adams v. State , 464 So. 2d 712 ( 1985 )

ANSTEAD, Chief Judge.

We reverse. In our view the evidence against the appellant was insufficient to establish anything more than a suspicion of misconduct. See Danek v. State, 429 So.2d 1369 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983) and Miller v. State, 420 So.2d 631 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982).

GLICKSTEIN, J., and GOLDMAN, MURRAY, Associate Judge, concur.