Cedars Associates v. E.R. Brownell & Associates, Inc. , 466 So. 2d 1130 ( 1985 )

PER CURIAM.

We affirm upon a finding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in striking and dismissing appellants’ counterclaim as a sanction for failure to furnish discovery. See Harless v. Kuhn, 403 So.2d 423 (Fla.1981); A.H. Robins Co. v. Devereaux, 415 So.2d 30 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982), review denied, 426 So.2d 25 (Fla.1983); Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.380(b)(2)(C).

Affirmed.