Overstreet v. State , 583 So. 2d 1123 ( 1991 )

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s convictions but reverse his sentence and remand for resen-tencing within the sentencing guidelines. We find the trial court erred as to the reasons given for departure, the failure to contemporaneously provide written reasons, and in failing to have appellant actually present at the sentencing hearing. See e.g., Jacobs v. State, 567 So.2d 16 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).

ANSTEAD, GUNTHER and FARMER, JJ., concur.