Wells v. Dugger , 589 So. 2d 342 ( 1991 )


Menu:
  • PER CURIAM.

    This appeal challenges a summary judgment in favor of appellee in which the trial court rejected the argument that gain time and provisional release credits unconstitutionally commute punishment. Because appellants have demonstrated no error, we affirm that portion of the order. No cross appeal was filed regarding the trial court’s ruling that, appellants had standing to challenge the constitutionality of these statu*343tory provisions. We accordingly do not address this issue.

    ERVIN, ZEHMER and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.

Document Info

Docket Number: No. 90-3361

Citation Numbers: 589 So. 2d 342

Judges: Barfield, Ervin, Zehmer

Filed Date: 11/4/1991

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 7/29/2022