M.W. v. State , 596 So. 2d 534 ( 1992 )

PER CURIAM.

We agree with the defendant that the circumstantial evidence presented by the state on the grand theft count failed to exclude every reasonable hypothesis of innocence and will not support the conviction. However, the record supports the defendant’s conviction for dealing in stolen property.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part.

GOSHORN, C.J., and COBB and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.