Bradford v. Lewis , 596 So. 2d 1139 ( 1992 )

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. The appellants claim reversible error in the trial court’s failure to give an instruction on the careless driving statute. We believe the matters set out in that statute were sufficiently covered in the court’s instructions on negligence and causation so as to preclude a finding of any substantial harm. We find no error in the other issues raised on appeal.

GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and ANSTEAD, J., concur. POLEN, J., dissents with opinion.