Johnson v. State , 644 So. 2d 1034 ( 1994 )

PER CURIAM.

We conclude that appellant’s challenge to the amount of restitution he was ordered to pay as a condition of probation is properly before us. E.g., J.M.G. v. State, 629 So.2d 1081 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); L.A.D. v. State, 616 So.2d 106 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). We conclude, further, that the evidence will not support an award of restitution in an amount exceeding $1,500.00. Accordingly, the order of restitution is reversed, and the case is remanded with directions to enter an amended order establishing restitution in the amount of $1,500.00.

REVERSED and REMANDED, with directions.

WOLF, WEBSTER and MICKLE, JJ., concur.