Shal v. Mills , 645 So. 2d 1079 ( 1994 )


Menu:
  • PER CURIAM.

    We affirm the finding that an easement has been abandoned. See Dean v. Mod Properties, Ltd., 528 So.2d 432 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); Joseph v. Duran, 436 So.2d 316 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); Dan Dee Corp. v. Samuels, 124 So.2d 733 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1960); Woodlawn Park Cemetery Co. v. City of Miami, 104 So.2d 851 (Fla. 3d DCA 1958); Powers v. Scobie, 60 So.2d 738 (Fla.1952). See and compare Southeast Seminole Civic Assoc. v. Adkins, 604 So.2d 523 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. denied 613 So.2d 9 (Fla.1992).

    Affirmed.

Document Info

Docket Number: No. 94-253

Citation Numbers: 645 So. 2d 1079

Judges: Barkdull, Gersten, Goderich

Filed Date: 11/23/1994

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 7/30/2022