Nembhard v. State , 657 So. 2d 971 ( 1995 )

PER CURIAM.

The trial court did not abuse its discretion when it denied appellant’s motions for mistrial where the impermissible testimony was harmless in light of the other overwhelming evidence of guilt. State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986).

Affirmed.