Sheen v. Smith Barney, Inc. , 721 So. 2d 823 ( 1998 )


Menu:
  • PER CURIAM.

    We affirm the final summary judgment entered on Appellant’s counterclaim. We have not, however, considered the order finding Appellee is entitled to attorney’s fees, as that issue is not ripe for review. See Winkelman v. Toll, 632 So.2d 130 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).

    STONE, C.J., and GUNTHER and WARNER, JJ., concur.

Document Info

Docket Number: No. 97-3438

Citation Numbers: 721 So. 2d 823

Judges: Gunther, Stone, Warner

Filed Date: 12/16/1998

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 7/30/2022