Gibson v. State , 810 So. 2d 1008 ( 2002 )

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Appellant’s claim that Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla.1993), entitles him to relief. This point is insufficiently pled. This affirmance is without prejudice to any right Appellant might have to file a facially sufficient rule 3.800(a) motion indicating where and how the record demonstrates that he is entitled to relief. See Holsworth v. State, 522 So.2d 348 (Fla.1988).

STONE, WARNER, and FARMER, JJ., concur.