Arnold v. State , 961 So. 2d 998 ( 2007 )

PER CURIAM.

Herbert Arnold seeks review of an order that denied his multi-point rule 3.850 motion. We remand for the trial court to conduct an evidentiary hearing limited solely to Arnold’s claim that counsel coerced him into waiving his right to testify. See, e.g., Oisorio v. State, 676 So.2d 1363, 1364-65 (Fla.1996); Barrientos v. State, 929 So.2d 705 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006).

STONE, GROSS and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.