State v. Gilchrist , 961 So. 2d 1043 ( 2007 )

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See State v. Carter, 835 So.2d 259, 262 (Fla.2002) (holding “[t]he trial court is in a better position to identify the probation violator’s motive, intent, and attitude and assess whether the violation is both willful and substantial.”).

PALMER, C.J., THOMPSON and MONACO, JJ., concur.