Nix v. State , 975 So. 2d 576 ( 2008 )


Menu:
  • PER CURIAM.

    We affirm the denial of appellant’s rule 3.800(a) motion to correct sentence, but without prejudice to raising the issue in a timely, non-successive rule 8.850 motion. See generally Tennant v. State, 827 So.2d 321 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002)..

    SHAHOOD, C.J., WARNER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Document Info

Docket Number: No. 4D08-230

Citation Numbers: 975 So. 2d 576

Judges: Klein, Shahood, Warner

Filed Date: 2/20/2008

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 7/30/2022