MAGDADENE DIEUVIL and GUILFORT DIEUVIL v. FALCON TRACE HOMEOWNERS ASSOC. INC. ( 2023 )


Menu:
  •        DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
    FOURTH DISTRICT
    MAGDADENE DIEUVIL and GUILFORT DIEUVIL,
    Appellants,
    v.
    FALCON TRACE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., et al.,
    Appellees.
    No. 4D22-2069
    [August 2, 2023]
    Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit,
    Indian River County; Janet C. Croom, Judge; L.T. Case No.
    312019CA000858.
    Magdadene Dieuvil and Guilfort Dieuvil, Vero Beach, pro se.
    D. Johnathan Rhodeback of Dill, Evans & Rhodeback, Sebastian
    (withdrew after filing briefs), and John Carrigan of Ross Earle Bonan Ensor
    & Carrigan, P.A., Stuart, for appellee Falcon Trace Homeowners
    Association, Inc.
    GERBER, J.
    The homeowner and his spouse (“the defendants”) appeal from the
    circuit court’s final summary judgment foreclosing a homeowners’
    association’s amended claim of lien for unpaid assessments, late fees, and
    interest. The defendants argue, among other things, that the circuit court
    prematurely entered the final summary judgment without having disposed
    of the defendants’ legally interrelated amended counterclaims, which had
    been pending before the circuit court entered the final summary judgment.
    We agree with that argument and therefore reverse the final summary
    judgment.
    “Florida adheres to the principal that piecemeal appeals should not be
    permitted where claims are legally interrelated and in substance involve
    the same transaction.” Ironshore Specialty Ins. Co. v. Conrad & Scherer,
    LLP, 
    338 So. 3d 297
    , 300 (Fla. 4th DCA 2022) (citations and internal
    quotation marks omitted).
    Here, the association’s foreclosure action and counts II, IV, and V of the
    defendants’ amended counterclaims were legally interrelated and involved
    the same transaction as to payments which the association claimed were
    overdue and in default. As a result, the circuit court prematurely entered
    its final summary judgment.
    Vital v. Summertree Village at California Club Condominium Association,
    Inc., 
    343 So. 3d 1260
     (Fla. 3d DCA 2022), is instructive. There, a circuit
    court entered a partial final foreclosure judgment for condominium
    maintenance fees and special assessments, without resolving the owners’
    pending affirmative defenses of unclean hands and setoff. Id. at 1262. The
    partial final judgment affixed damages, awarded attorney’s fees, and set a
    foreclosure date. Id. The owners appealed, and the association partially
    confessed error, leading the Third District to conclude the appeal was
    premature because the judgment was not final. Id. Our sister court
    reasoned:
    In this case … we do have appellate jurisdiction to review the
    challenged orders because they purport to adjudicate, with
    finality, [the association’s] foreclosure claim. [The orders] are
    in the form of a final judgment, affix damages, are fully
    executable, and establish a foreclosure sale date. Indeed, if
    [the appellant] had not appealed the orders, the foreclosure
    sale presumably would have ensued.              Hence, as [the
    association] commendably and correctly concedes, we have
    appellate jurisdiction to review these orders, and we are
    compelled to reverse them. See Del Castillo v. Ralor Pharmacy,
    Inc., 
    512 So. 2d 315
    , 319 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987) (“[I]t is ...
    improper to render an order in the form of an ordinary final
    money judgment, while contradictorily and simultaneously
    leaving an issue for future adjudication.”); see also Surijon v.
    Zarria, 
    278 So. 3d 328
    , 329 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019); Baumann v.
    Intracoastal Pac. Ltd. P’ship, 
    619 So. 2d 403
    , 404 (Fla. 3d DCA
    1993); Pointer Oil Co. v. Butler Aviation of Miami, Inc., 
    293 So. 2d 389
    , 390-91 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974).
    Id. at 1263 (footnote omitted). Based on that reasoning, the Third District
    reversed the final judgment on appeal. Id.
    Consistent with Vital, we reverse the final summary judgment in this
    case, and remand for the circuit court to resolve the defendants’ legally
    interrelated amended counterclaims before considering whether to enter a
    final summary judgment against the defendants on the association’s
    foreclosure action.
    2
    Reversed and remanded with instructions.
    GROSS and LEVINE, JJ., concur.
    *      *           *
    Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
    3