-
Lumpkin, J. The evidence was conflicting, but was sufficient to authorize the verdict, and there was no error in overruling the motion for a new trial. ■ Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concur.
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 136 Ga. 166
Judges: Lumpkin
Filed Date: 4/13/1911
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 1/12/2023