Barge v. State , 9 Ga. App. 226 ( 1911 )


Menu:
  • I-Iiix, C. J.

    1. This court will not interfere with the discretion of the trial judge in refusing to allow the attorney for the movant further time in which to amend' the motion for a new trial, unless it clearly appears that such discretion was manifestly abused. In the present ease there was no abuse of discretion.

    2. No error of law appears, and the verdict is fully supported by the evidence. Judgment affirmed,.

Document Info

Docket Number: 3210

Citation Numbers: 9 Ga. App. 226

Judges: Iiix

Filed Date: 4/11/1911

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 1/12/2023