STEPHEN FRIEDMAN v. FLYING CRUST, LLC ( 2022 )


Menu:
  • Court of Appeals
    of the State of Georgia
    ATLANTA,____________________
    February 04, 2022
    The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
    A22A0813. STEPHEN FRIEDMAN et al. v. FLYING CRUST, LLC et al.
    Petitioners Flying Crust, LLC, Garis Pierre Eddington, and Debra Ffrench filed
    a petition seeking an interlocutory injunction, declaratory judgment, and equitable
    relief against eight respondents: Fevzi Aydin, Koray Aydin, Henok Kebede, Binyam
    Yayine, Stephen Friedman, Birole Kose, Aydin Jewelers, LLC, and Loop
    Development, LLC. Several of the respondents moved to compel arbitration under an
    operating agreement.1 However, not all respondents were parties to the operating
    agreement. The trial court thus granted the motion to compel to the extent it applied
    to the parties to the operating agreement and stayed litigation pending the issuance
    of an arbitration award. Four of the respondents filed a notice of appeal from this
    order. We, however, lack jurisdiction.
    “As a general matter the grant of an application to compel arbitration is not
    directly appealable pursuant to OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (4), but is instead an interlocutory
    matter reviewable pursuant to OCGA § 5-6-34 (b).” Austin Regional Home Care, Inc.
    v. Careminders Home Care, Inc., 
    344 Ga. App. 608
    , 608 (810 SE2d 676) (2018)
    (punctuation omitted). Where, as here, the trial court’s order does not dismiss the
    underlying action in its entirety, the appellants were required to follow the
    interlocutory appeal procedures in order to appeal. See 
    id. 608-609
    ; OCGA § 5-6-34
    1
    The motion to compel was purportedly filed on behalf of Kebede, Kose,
    Yayine, Friedman, and Loop Development. There was some question as to whether
    the attorney who filed the motion to compel represented all of the respondents at the
    time the motion was filed.
    (b). The appellants’ failure to comply with the interlocutory appeal procedure
    deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.
    Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
    Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
    02/04/2022
    I certify that the above is a true extract from
    the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
    Witness my signature and the seal of said court
    hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
    , Clerk.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: A22A0813

Filed Date: 2/4/2022

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/4/2022