Jason Wooten v. State ( 2022 )


Menu:
  • Court of Appeals
    of the State of Georgia
    ATLANTA,____________________
    February 07, 2022
    The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
    A22D0226. JASON WOOTEN v. THE STATE.
    Jason Wooten, who is proceeding pro se, has filed an application for
    discretionary review of the trial court’s order correcting a clerical error in its original
    written sentence. The order, however, appears to be subject to direct appeal.
    Wooten pled guilty in 2016 to vehicular homicide and other charges. The court
    sentenced him to a total of 30 years, with the first 18 years to be served in
    confinement. In 2021, Wooten filed a motion to correct the sentence, alleging that the
    court had improperly imposed multiple sentences for the same conduct. In its order
    ruling on the motion, the court stated that the original sentence as written contained
    clerical errors, and it thus amended the sentence to reflect the court’s intent at the
    time the original sentence was imposed.1
    The trial court has the “inherent power to correct its records at any time to
    show the true intent of the sentencing court at the time the original sentence was
    imposed.” State v. Hart, 
    263 Ga. App. 8
    , 9 (587 SE2d 164) (2003) (punctuation
    omitted). And when a party files a motion seeking such relief, this Court has
    entertained direct appeals from the trial court’s ruling on the motion. See id.; see also
    Griggs v. State, 
    314 Ga. App. 158
    , 159-160 (2) (723 SE2d 480) (2012).
    Thus, to the extent Wooten sought relief under the court’s inherent power to
    correct its records, he is entitled to a direct appeal from the trial court’s ruling on his
    1
    As amended, the final sentencing document provided for the same aggregate
    sentence as the original sentencing document (i.e., 30 years, 18 to serve).«Exh. p. 23-
    25»
    motion. See Griggs, 314 Ga. App. at 159-160 (2). We will grant a timely filed
    application for discretionary appeal if the lower court’s order is subject to direct
    appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (j).2
    Accordingly, this application is hereby GRANTED, and Wooten shall have ten
    days from the date of this order to file a notice of appeal in the trial court. If he has
    already filed a timely notice of appeal in the trial court, he need not file a second
    notice. The clerk of the trial court is directed to include a copy of this order in the
    appeal record transmitted to this Court.
    Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
    Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
    02/07/2022
    I certify that the above is a true extract from
    the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
    Witness my signature and the seal of said court
    hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
    , Clerk.
    2
    In its response to Wooten’s application for discretionary appeal, the State
    concedes that the order at issue is subject to direct appeal and prays that the
    application be granted pursuant to OCGA § 5-6-35 (j).
    

Document Info

Docket Number: A22D0226

Filed Date: 2/7/2022

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/7/2022