Daniel Castleberry v. Stephanie Anne Lockhart ( 2019 )


Menu:
  • Court of Appeals
    of the State of Georgia
    ATLANTA,____________________
    January 22, 2019
    The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
    A19A1013. DANIEL CASTLEBERRY v. STEPHANIE ANNE LOCKHART et
    al.
    In November 2018, Daniel Castleberry attempted to file a petition for a writ of
    mandamus against two individual defendants. The trial court denied filing of the
    petition under OCGA § 9-15-2 (d), on the ground that it showed a complete absence
    of any justiciable issue of law or fact. Castleberry then filed both a direct appeal –
    which has been docketed as the instant case, No. A19A1013 – and an application for
    discretionary review, which we denied on the merits. See Daniel Castleberry v.
    Stephanie Anne Biggers a/k/a Stephanie Anne Lockhart et al., No. A19D0245 (Jan.
    10, 2019).
    Because we rejected Castleberry’s challenge to the trial court order sought to
    be appealed here in Case No. A19D0245, the current appeal is barred by the law of
    the case. See Ross v. State, 
    310 Ga. App. 326
    , 327 (713 SE2d 438) (2011) (“[A]ny
    issue that was raised and resolved in an earlier appeal is the law of the case and is
    binding on this Court . . . .”) (punctuation omitted); accord Hook v. Bergen, 
    286 Ga. App. 258
    , 261 (1) (649 SE2d 313) (2007) (“[T]he denial of an application for
    discretionary appeal is an adjudication on the merits of the underlying order and acts
    as res judicata in subsequent proceedings.”); see also Jackson v. State, 
    273 Ga. 320
    ,
    320 (540 SE2d 612) (2001) (a defendant “is not entitled to another bite at the apple
    by way of a second appeal”).
    Consequently, there is nothing for this Court to review in the instant appeal,
    which is hereby DISMISSED. See Jackson, 
    273 Ga. at 320
    ; Ross, 310 Ga. App. at
    327-328. Castleberry’s motions for oral argument, to verify the absence of an
    account summary in a federal court case, for the production of transcripts from a
    Tennessee court, and for DNA testing are DENIED as MOOT.
    Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
    Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
    01/22/2019
    I certify that the above is a true extract from
    the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
    Witness my signature and the seal of said court
    hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
    , Clerk.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: A19A1013

Filed Date: 2/11/2019

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/11/2019