Alfonza McKeever v. State ( 2019 )


Menu:
  • Court of Appeals
    of the State of Georgia
    ATLANTA,____________________
    February 05, 2019
    The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
    A19D0287. ALFONZA MCKEEVER v. THE STATE.
    The trial court ordered Alfonza McKeever, who is proceeding pro se, to
    cooperate with an evaluation by the Department of Behavioral Health and
    Developmental Disabilities (“DBHDD”), and also found him competent to stand trial
    on criminal charges. McKeever then filed a notice of a neuropsychological evaluation
    of himself. The trial court ruled that, to the degree that the notice of the
    neuropsychological evaluation was intended to indicate McKeever’s competence or
    criminal responsibility, it was excluded because McKeever had not complied with its
    prior order to cooperate with DBHDD. McKeever also filed a “request for extension
    of time to file, plaintiff delay of documents and [transcripts,] audio recording, grant
    deposition from all co-defenders and accusers,” which the trial court denied, noting
    that the trial was set for January 14, 2019. McKeever thereafter filed this application
    for discretionary review. Although McKeever’s application and supplemental
    application are somewhat unclear, it appears that he is challenging the trial court’s
    denial of his request for an extension of time and the exclusion of his notice of the
    evaluation.1 We, however, lack jurisdiction.
    It is clear from the trial court’s orders that the case remains pending below.
    Therefore, the orders that McKeever wishes to appeal are interlocutory in nature, and
    1
    Indeed, these orders are the only recent trial court orders in the application
    materials. See Court of Appeals Rule 31 (c) (providing that discretionary applications
    must contain a copy of the trial court’s order or judgment from which the appeal is
    sought).
    he was required to follow the interlocutory application procedure set forth in OCGA
    § 5-6-34 (b), which includes obtaining a certificate of immediate review from the trial
    court. Bailey v. Bailey, 
    266 Ga. 832
    , 833 (471 SE2d 213) (1996); Scruggs v. Ga.
    Dept. of Human Resources, 
    261 Ga. 587
    , 588-589 (1) (408 SE2d 103) (1991).
    McKeever’s failure to comply with the interlocutory review procedure deprives us of
    jurisdiction over this application, which is hereby DISMISSED.
    Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
    Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
    02/05/2019
    I certify that the above is a true extract from
    the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
    Witness my signature and the seal of said court
    hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
    , Clerk.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: A19D0287

Filed Date: 2/11/2019

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/11/2019