Kyjuane L. Chatman v. State ( 2014 )


Menu:
  • Court of Appeals
    of the State of Georgia
    ATLANTA,____________________
    December 19, 2014
    The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
    A15D0175. KYJUANE L. CHATMAN v. THE STATE.
    In 2004, Chatman was convicted of rape, aggravated sodomy, kidnapping, and
    false imprisonment. The trial court imposed life sentences on the rape and aggravated
    sodomy counts, twenty years for kidnapping, and ten years for false imprisonment.1
    The trial court ordered that all of the sentences were to run concurrently. We affirmed
    Chatman’s convictions on appeal. See Chatman v. State, 
    283 Ga. App. 673
     (642 SE2d
    361) (2007). In October 2014, Chatman filed a motion to modify his sentence,
    arguing that the state did not give notice of its intent to sentence him as a recidivist.
    The trial court denied the motion and this application followed.
    An appeal lies from the denial of a motion to correct a void sentence when the
    defendant raises a colorable claim that the sentence is, in fact, void or illegal. See
    Burg v. State, 
    297 Ga. App. 118
    , 119 (676 SE2d 465) (2009). “Under Georgia law,
    a sentence is void if the court imposes punishment that the law does not allow. A
    sentence that falls within the prescribed statutory limits, however, is legally
    authorized and is not subject to review by this Court.” (Punctuation and citation
    omitted.) Few v. State, 
    311 Ga. App. 608
     (716 SE2d 644) (2011). Under OCGA § 16-
    6-1 (b), a person convicted of rape, whether or not he is a recidivist, may be punished
    by “imprisonment for life without parole, by imprisonment for life, or by a split
    sentence that is a term of imprisonment for not less than 25 years and not exceeding
    life imprisonment, followed by probation.”
    1
    Chatman also pled guilty to marijuana possession for which he received a
    sentence of 12 months.
    Because Chatman’s sentence was within prescribed statutory limits, he has not
    raised a colorable void sentence claim. Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction to review
    his claim. His application, therefore, is hereby DISMISSED.
    Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
    12/19/2014
    Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
    I certify that the above is a true extract from
    the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
    Witness my signature and the seal of said court
    hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
    , Clerk.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: A15D0175

Filed Date: 12/25/2014

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 12/31/2014