Harris v. State , 28 Ga. App. 241 ( 1922 )

BloodwortH, J.

The defendant was convicted on circumstantial evidence. The facts proved did not exclude every other reasonable hypothesis save tnat of the guilt of the accused, and the judge erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Luke, J., concurs. Broyles, C. J., dissents.