Jason Todd Smith v. State ( 2021 )


Menu:
  • Court of Appeals
    of the State of Georgia
    ATLANTA,____________________
    March 10, 2021
    The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
    A21A1093. JASON TODD SMITH v. THE STATE.
    In 1998, Jason Todd Smith pled guilty to statutory rape, and he was sentenced
    to five years probation as a first offender. In 2020, Smith filed a motion to vacate a
    void sentence. The trial court dismissed the motion, and Smith filed this appeal. We
    lack jurisdiction.
    Under OCGA § 17-10-1 (f), a court may modify a sentence during the year
    after its imposition or within 120 days after remittitur following a direct appeal,
    whichever is later. Frazier v. State, 
    302 Ga. App. 346
    , 348 (691 SE2d 247) (2010).
    Once this statutory period expires, a trial court may modify only a void sentence. 
    Id.
    A sentence is void if the court imposes punishment that the law does not allow. Jones
    v. State, 
    278 Ga. 669
    , 670 (604 SE2d 483) (2004). When a sentence falls within the
    statutory range of punishment, it is not void and is not subject to modification beyond
    the time provided in § 17-10-1 (f). See id. Moreover, a direct appeal does not lie
    from the trial court’s ruling on a motion to modify a sentence filed outside the
    statutory time period unless the motion raises a colorable claim that the sentence is,
    in fact, void. Frazier, 302 Ga. App. at 348.
    In his motion to vacate his sentence, Smith argued that the trial court’s failure
    to sentence him to a split sentence rendered the sentence void and that he was thus
    entitled to withdraw his guilty plea. Although the legislature amended OCGA §
    17-10-6.2 (b) in 2017 to require the imposition of a split sentence for certain sexual
    offenses, there was no such requirement in effect at the time Smith was sentenced.
    The trial court was thus not required to impose a split sentence. See Martinez-Chavez
    v. State, 
    352 Ga. App. 142
    , 143 (1) (834 SE2d 139) (2019) (court is required to
    sentence a defendant pursuant to the statute in effect at the time the crime was
    committed). Accordingly, Smith has not raised a colorable void sentence claim, and
    this appeal is hereby DISMISSED.
    Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
    Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
    03/10/2021
    I certify that the above is a true extract from
    the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
    Witness my signature and the seal of said court
    hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
    , Clerk.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: A21A1093

Filed Date: 3/16/2021

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 3/16/2021