Rochester v. Busch ( 1996 )


Menu:
  •                             UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 96-6294
    JULIAN EDWARD ROCHESTER,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    BOBBY E. BUSCH, Director; LIEUTENANT SUMMEY;
    DON BLACKWELL, Mr.; CINDY DOE, Ms.; OCONEE
    COUNTY,
    Defendants - Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Charleston. William B. Traxler, Jr., District
    Judge. (CA-95-169-2-21-AJ)
    Submitted:   September 20, 1996           Decided:   October 1, 1996
    Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Julian Edward Rochester, Appellant Pro Se. William Henry Davidson,
    II, John Thomas Lay, Jr., ELLIS, LAWHORNE, DAVIDSON & SIMS, P.A.,
    Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).
    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying
    relief on his 
    42 U.S.C. § 1983
     (1994) complaint. We have reviewed
    the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
    error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
    court. Rochester v. Busch, No. CA-95-169-2-21-AJ (D.S.C. Jan. 22,
    1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 96-6294

Filed Date: 10/1/1996

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021