Fagaragan v. State ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                                                          Electronically Filed
    Supreme Court
    SCPW-14-0001258
    08-DEC-2014
    09:16 AM
    SCPW-14-0001258
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
    ERWIN FAGARAGAN, Petitioner,
    vs.
    STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent.
    ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
    (SCWC-11-0000592; CAAP-11-0000592; S.P.P. NO. 11-1-0005(1);
    CR. NOS. 04-1-0595(1) & 05-1-0090(1))
    ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
    (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
    Upon consideration of Petitioner Erwin Fagaragan’s
    letter dated October 22, 2014, which was filed as a petition for
    a writ of mandamus on October 31, 2014, and the record, it
    appears that Petitioner fails to demonstrate that he has a clear
    and indisputable right to a March 2015 parole rehearing and
    Petitioner has alternative means to obtain relief.      See Turner v.
    Hawai#i Paroling Authority, 93 Hawai#i 298, 306, 
    1 P.3d 768
    , 776
    (2000).   Petitioner, therefore, is not entitled to the requested
    relief from this court.   See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai#i 200, 204,
    
    982 P.2d 334
    , 338 (1999) (a writ of mandamus is an extraordinary
    remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a
    clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative
    means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the
    requested action); In re Disciplinary Bd. of Hawai#i Supreme
    Court, 91 Hawai#i 363, 368, 
    984 P.2d 688
    , 693 (1999) (mandamus
    relief is available to compel an official to perform a duty
    allegedly owed to an individual only if the individual’s claim is
    clear and certain, the official’s duty is ministerial and so
    plainly prescribed as to be free from doubt, and no other remedy
    is available).   Accordingly,
    IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the clerk of the appellate
    court shall process the petition for a writ of mandamus without
    payment of the filing fee.
    IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for a
    writ of mandamus is denied, without prejudice to Petitioner
    seeking relief, as appropriate, in the circuit court.
    DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, December 8, 2014.
    /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
    /s/ Paula A. Nakayama
    /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
    /s/ Richard W. Pollack
    /s/ Michael D. Wilson
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: SCPW-14-0001258

Filed Date: 12/8/2014

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 12/9/2014