Hasegawa v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel ( 2012 )


Menu:
  •                                                           Electronically Filed
    Supreme Court
    SCPW-12-0000671
    08-AUG-2012
    NO. SCPW-12-0000671
    01:59 PM
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
    CLIFTON M. HASEGAWA, Petitioner,
    vs.
    OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Respondent.
    ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
    ORDER
    (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.)
    By e-mail dated July 12, 2012, which we treat as a
    petition for a writ of mandamus, petitioner Clifton Hasegawa asks
    this court to direct the Office of Disciplinary Counsel to proceed
    with an investigation into the complaints he filed against David M.
    Louie, John M. Molay, Mark J. Bennett and Caron (misspelled "Coron")
    Inagaki.
    A writ of mandamus and/or prohibition will not issue
    unless a petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to
    relief and a lack of other means to redress adequately the alleged
    wrong or obtain the requested action.       See Kema v. Gaddis, 
    91 Hawai'i 200
    , 204, 
    982 P.2d 334
    , 338 (1999).       Mandamus relief is
    available to compel an official to perform a duty allegedly owed to
    an individual only if the individual’s claim is clear and certain,
    the official’s duty is ministerial and so plainly prescribed as to
    be free from doubt, and no other remedy is available.        In re
    Disciplinary Bd., 
    94 Hawai'i 363
    , 368, 371, 
    984 P.2d 688
    , 693, 695
    (1999) (citations omitted).   Inasmuch as disciplinary counsel has
    authority to investigate and dismiss matters involving alleged
    misconduct called to his or her attention, which actions are more
    than ministerial, see RSCH Rule 2.6(b)(2) and (3); In re
    Disciplinary Bd., 94 Hawai'i at 368, 371, 
    984 P.2d 688
     at 693, 695,
    Hasegawa fails to demonstrate that he is entitled to mandamus
    relief.   Accordingly,
    IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the clerk of the appellate court
    shall process the petition for a writ of mandamus without payment of
    the filing fee.
    IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition is denied.
    DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, August 8, 2012.
    /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
    /s/ Paula A. Nakayama
    /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.
    /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
    /s/ Richard W. Pollack
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: SCPW-12-0000671

Filed Date: 8/8/2012

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014