Graham v. First Circuit Court ( 2022 )


Menu:
  •                                                         Electronically Filed
    Supreme Court
    SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX
    15-JUL-2022
    08:30 AM
    Dkt. 5 ODDP
    SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
    GARRETH A. GRAHAM, Petitioner,
    vs.
    FIRST CIRCUIT COURT, STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent.
    ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
    (CASE NO. 1CPN-XX-XXXXXXX)
    ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
    (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)
    Upon consideration of petitioner Garreth A. Graham’s
    petition for writ of mandamus, filed July 6, 2022, the documents
    attached and submitted in support, and the record, the circuit
    court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are within the
    January 28, 2022 order dismissing Graham’s Hawai#i Rules of Penal
    Procedure (HRPP) Rule 40 petition, and Graham has alternative
    means to seek relief by making an appropriate request in the
    circuit court.   See HRPP Rule 49(d) (“A party who has failed to
    receive due notice or to be served, or who has been prejudiced by
    reason that service was made by mail or facsimile transmission,
    may apply to the court for appropriate relief.”).    An
    extraordinary writ is thus not warranted.   See Kema v. Gaddis, 91
    Hawai#i 200, 204, 
    982 P.2d 334
    , 338 (1999) (observing that a writ
    of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless
    the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to
    relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the
    alleged wrong or obtain the requested action); Barnett v.
    Broderick, 84 Hawai#i 109, 111, 
    929 P.2d 1359
    , 1361 (1996)
    (observing that mandamus relief is available to compel an
    official to perform a duty allegedly owed to an individual only
    if the individual’s claim is clear and certain, the official’s
    duty is ministerial and so plainly prescribed as to be free from
    doubt, and no other remedy is available).   Accordingly,
    It is ordered that the petition for writ of mandamus is
    denied.
    It is further ordered that the appellate court clerk
    shall process the petition without payment of the filing fee.
    DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, July 15, 2022.
    /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
    /s/ Paula A. Nakayama
    /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
    /s/ Michael D. Wilson
    /s/ Todd W. Eddins
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: SCPW-22-0000431

Filed Date: 7/15/2022

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 7/15/2022