Maddox v. Loo ( 2020 )


Menu:
  •                                                          Electronically Filed
    Supreme Court
    SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX
    27-FEB-2020
    02:07 PM
    SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
    MICKEY A. MADDOX, Petitioner,
    vs.
    THE HONORABLE RHONDA I. L. LOO, Judge of the Circuit Court of the
    Second Circuit, State of Hawai#i, Respondent Judge,
    and
    STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent.
    ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
    (SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX; S.P.P. NO. 13-1-0004; CR. NO. 09-1-0284)
    ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
    (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
    Upon consideration of petitioner Mickey A. Maddox’s
    petition for writ of mandamus, filed on January 6, 2020, the
    respondent State of Hawai#i’s answer, filed on February 6, 2020,
    the respondent judge’s response, filed on February 6, 2020, the
    respective supporting documents, and the record, it appears that
    the circuit court has granted the motion for new counsel and
    appointed new counsel to represent petitioner, the motion for
    disqualification/recusal is currently set for February 18, 2020,
    at 8:15 a.m., and, as explained by the respondent judge, once the
    motion for disqualification/recusal has been decided, the
    evidentiary hearing will be set.       Thus, based on the current
    state of the underlying record in this case, petitioner’s request
    for extraordinary relief is not warranted.       See Kema v. Gaddis,
    91 Hawai#i 200, 204, 
    982 P.2d 334
    , 338 (1999) (a writ of mandamus
    is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the
    petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief
    and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged
    wrong or obtain the requested action); Wong v. Fong, 
    60 Haw. 601
    ,
    604, 
    593 P.2d 386
    , 389 (1979) (an extraordinary writ will
    ordinarily be invoked in exceptional circumstances amounting to
    judicial usurpation of power).    Accordingly,
    IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for writ of
    mandamus is denied.
    DATED:   Honolulu, Hawai#i, February 27, 2020.
    /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
    /s/ Paula A. Nakayama
    /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
    /s/ Richard W. Pollack
    /s/ Michael D. Wilson
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: SCPW-20-0000006

Filed Date: 2/27/2020

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/28/2020