Lord v. Kobata ( 2023 )


Menu:
  •                                                         Electronically Filed
    Supreme Court
    SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX
    18-APR-2023
    11:02 AM
    Dkt. 25 ORD
    SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI
    _______________________________________________________________
    ESTATE OF VIVIAN T. LORD, by her PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE
    WILLIAM H. GILLIAM; and WILLIAM H. GILLIAM individually,
    Petitioners/Plaintiffs-Appellants,
    vs.
    LESLIE KOBATA, REGISTRAR, in his
    official capacity only; PORTER McGUIRE KIAKONA & CHOW, LLP;
    PORTER McGUIRE KIAKONA, LLP; FOREST B. JENKINS;
    CHONG, NISHIMOTO, SIA, NAKAMURA & GOYA, LLLP; JEFFREY H.K. SIA;
    DOROTHY P.H. MEISNER; SHANA MAGUIRE; HAWAII FIRST, INC.;
    CERTIFIED MANAGEMENT, INC., dba ASSOCIA, HAWAII; and
    ASSOCIATION OF APARTMENT OWNERS OF KUHIO SHORES AT POIPU,
    Respondents/Defendants-Appellees.
    ___________________________________________________________
    CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
    (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; CIV. NO. 1CCV-XX-XXXXXXX)
    ORDER
    (By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, and Eddins, JJ.,
    Circuit Judge Castagnetti, in place of Nakayama, J., recused,
    and Circuit Judge Souza, in place of Wilson, J., recused)
    Upon consideration of the document filed on February
    21, 2023, it is ordered:
    1.   The application for a writ of certiorari is
    rejected.
    2.    The petition for a writ of mandamus or
    prohibition is denied.   Petitioners have alternative means to
    seek relief because 1CCV-XX-XXXXXXX is ongoing and the vexatious
    litigant order and order addressing attorney fees and costs may
    be reviewed on appeal.   Petitioners have also not demonstrated a
    clear and indisputable right to relief because it is within the
    circuit court’s jurisdiction and discretion to decide the motion
    for attorney fees and costs.   An extraordinary writ is thus not
    warranted.   See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawaiʻi 200, 204-05, 
    982 P.2d 334
    , 338-39 (1999); Honolulu Advertiser, Inc. v. Takao, 
    59 Haw. 237
    , 241–42, 
    580 P.2d 58
    , 62 (1978).
    3.    The request for a stay is denied.   If and when
    appropriate, Petitioners may seek a stay in the circuit court
    pursuant to Hawaiʻi Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 62 and Hawaiʻi
    Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 8.
    DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, April 18, 2023.
    /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
    /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
    /s/ Todd W. Eddins
    /s/ Jeannette H. Castagnetti
    /s/ Kevin A.K. Souza
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: SCWC-22-0000591

Filed Date: 4/18/2023

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2023