Scutt v. Maui Memorial Hospital ( 2021 )


Menu:
  •   NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
    Electronically Filed
    Intermediate Court of Appeals
    CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX
    29-APR-2021
    08:37 AM
    Dkt. 59 SO
    NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX
    IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
    OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
    JASON SCUTT, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    MAUI MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, Defendant-Appellee
    APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE SECOND CIRCUIT
    (WAILUKU DIVISION)
    (CASE NO. 2DRC-XX-XXXXXXX)
    SUMMARY DISPOSITION ORDER
    (By:    Ginoza, Chief Judge, Leonard and Hiraoka, JJ.)
    Self-represented Plaintiff-Appellant Jason Scutt
    appeals from the "Order Dismissing Without Prejudice" entered by
    the District Court of the Second Circuit, Wailuku Division1 on
    November 25, 2020. Scutt's opening brief does not comply with
    Rule 28 of the Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP).
    Nevertheless, to promote access to justice the Hawai#i Supreme
    Court instructs that pleadings prepared by self-represented
    litigants should be interpreted liberally, and self-represented
    litigants should not be automatically foreclosed from appellate
    review because they fail to comply with court rules. Erum v.
    Llego, 147 Hawai#i 368, 380-81, 
    465 P.3d 815
    , 827-28 (2020).
    Accordingly, we address Scutt's appeal on the merits. For the
    reasons explained below, we affirm the "Order Dismissing Without
    Prejudice."
    1
    The Honorable Kirstin Hamman presided.
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
    On June 29, 2020, Scutt filed a civil complaint in
    district court against Defendant-Appellee Maui Memorial Hospital.
    Rule 12 of the Hawai#i District Court Rules of Civil Procedure
    provides, in relevant part:
    (a) Answers — When presented; return day. All
    defendants shall appear or answer at the time appointed in
    the summons, on the second Monday following the date of
    service, except where the district judge sets some other
    secular day; and should such Monday be a legal holiday then
    upon the next secular day.
    Attached to Scutt's complaint was a summons, signed by
    the district court clerk. The summons stated:
    TO THE DEFENDANT:
    You are required to file a written answer or appear
    before the District Judge of this Court, in the Judge's
    Courtroom, on the day and at the time designated by the
    checked box on page 2.
    The boxes checked on page 2 of the summons identified the Wailuku
    Division as the location for the return, and the return day as
    "8:30 a.m. on the second Monday following date of service, and
    should that Monday be a legal holiday then upon the next Monday."
    Maui Memorial Hospital was served on Saturday, July 11,
    2020. The return of service was filed in the district court on
    July 16, 2020. Scutt was electronically notified of the filing
    of the return of service.
    The return date was Monday, July 20, 2020. The case
    was called. Scutt was not present. No attorney for Maui
    Memorial Hospital was present. The district court's minutes
    indicate the case was dismissed without prejudice.
    Scutt's notice of appeal was filed on July 21, 2020.
    On October 16, 2020, we temporarily remanded the case to the
    district court for entry of a written order as required by Hawaii
    Revised Statutes (HRS) § 641-1(a) (2016), pursuant to Waikiki v.
    Ho#omaka Vill. Ass'n of Apartment Owners, 140 Hawai#i 197, 204,
    
    398 P.3d 786
    , 793 (2017). The "Order Dismissing Without
    Prejudice" was entered by the district court on November 25,
    2020. Scutt's notice of appeal is deemed to have been filed at
    that time. HRAP Rule 4(b)(4).
    2
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
    The district court had inherent power to dismiss the
    case for want of prosecution. See Compass Dev., Inc. v. Blevins,
    
    10 Haw. App. 388
    , 393, 
    876 P.2d 1335
    , 1338 (1994); HRS § 604-7(e)
    (2016). Scutt's opening brief presents no argument about why the
    district court's dismissal without prejudice was improper. The
    "Order Dismissing Without Prejudice" is affirmed.
    DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, April 29, 2021.
    On the briefs:
    /s/ Lisa M. Ginoza
    Jason Scutt,                          Chief Judge
    Self-represented
    Plaintiff-Appellant.                  /s/ Katherine G. Leonard
    Associate Judge
    Edquon Lee,
    for Defendant-Appellee.               /s/ Keith K. Hiraoka
    Associate Judge
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: CAAP-20-0000466

Filed Date: 4/29/2021

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 4/29/2021