First Hawaiian Bank v. Palmer ( 2021 )


Menu:
  •   NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
    Electronically Filed
    Intermediate Court of Appeals
    CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX
    29-SEP-2021
    08:23 AM
    Dkt. 27 OGMD
    NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX
    IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
    OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
    FIRST HAWAIIAN BANK, Plaintiff-Appellee, v.
    TARA BOSKOFF PALMER, Defendant-Appellant,
    LAKEVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC, Defendant-Appellee,
    JOHN DOES 1-10; JANE DOES 1-10; DOE PARTNERSHIPS 1-10;
    DOE CORPORATIONS 1-10; DOE ENTITIES 1-10;
    DOE GOVERNMENTAL UNITS 1-10, Defendants
    APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND CIRCUIT
    (CIVIL NO. 2CC191000040)
    ORDER GRANTING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL
    (By: Ginoza, Chief Judge, Nakasone and Fujise, JJ.)
    Upon consideration of the July 26, 2021 Motion to
    Dismiss Appeal (motion) by Defendant-Appellant Tara Boskoff
    Palmer (Appellant), the papers in support, and the record, it
    appears that Appellant requests her appeal be dismissed pursuant
    to a settlement with Plaintiff-Appellee First Hawaiian Bank on
    the condition that this court remand the case to the circuit
    court for further proceedings.
    "[T]he withdrawal [of an appeal] not only terminat[es]
    the appellate proceedings and restore[s] the lower court's
    jurisdiction . . . and operated instantly as a matter of law to
    vacate the appeal as far as the decree and rights of the parties
    were concerned precisely as though no appeal had been taken,
    there being an absence of statute to the contrary in this
    territory." Jay v. Jay 
    37 Haw. 34
    , 37 (Terr. 1944); see also,
    Solarana v. Indus. Elecs., Inc., 
    50 Haw. 22
    , 31, 
    428 P.2d 411
    ,
    417–18 (1967) quoting Jay ("Plaintiff's withdrawal of the prior
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
    appeal operated 'precisely as though no appeal had been
    taken.'"). There appears good cause to grant in part Appellant's
    motion to dismiss and an order of remand is denied as
    unnecessary.
    Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the case is
    dismissed. All other requested relief is denied.
    DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, September 29, 2021.
    /s/ Lisa M. Ginoza
    Chief Judge
    /s/ Karen T. Nakasone
    Associate Judge
    /s/ Alexa D.M. Fujise
    Associate Judge
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: CAAP-21-0000379

Filed Date: 9/29/2021

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/29/2021